L: That’s where some of the workshop sessions played their part. Some of the feedback was that certain parts of the previous brand were either confusing, not needed or overcomplicated.
So one of the first stages of the approach was to simplify. And this could be justified by the fact that the work and the service in the first place was first class; so we didn’t need any visual smoke and mirrors to cover any cracks in our offering—which meant there was a real confidence to simplify.
I picked the number of values, both for practical, scientific reasons and if I’m being honest, totally arbitrary reasons, too. Practically speaking, a group of people will struggle to remember every value if you pick a larger number. In practise, that will work by some people remembering two, someone else remembering another two and someone else at best remembering three or four—but they could be different ones again.
That means, if you truly want people to operate by the values the company sets, those people are all pulling in slightly different directions, which is obviously not what you want for your team or your clients.
Choosing just three values was the somewhat arbitrary part; we had this idea that the capital D from Dynamic had three sides—which also could act as a play button, which also could imply moving forward or progress.
So there was a lot of triangle chat—three sides, three values, three words in the strapline. Let’s keep everything simple!